diff --git a/Gleeson_paper.tex b/Gleeson_paper.tex
index 76ac8e8..4de8e1f 100755
--- a/Gleeson_paper.tex
+++ b/Gleeson_paper.tex
@@ -308,6 +308,7 @@
 captured using the software and written to the Excel worksheet.
 
 \begin{figure}
+	\centering
 	\includegraphics{test-screenshot}
 	\caption{Screenshot of the test with the target in the top left of
 	the screen and the ``go'' button in the centre.}
@@ -357,6 +358,7 @@
 combo box as illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig-combo-box}.
 
 \begin{figure}
+	\centering
 	\caption{The two-step action required to select the combo box.}
 	\label{fig-combo-box}
 \end{figure}
@@ -407,7 +409,8 @@
 of distance and the angle from the starting point.
 
 \begin{figure}
-	\includegraphics[scale=0.85]{target-positions}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{target-positions}
 	\caption{Positions of targets tested. The black box represents the
 	starting point and the rounded rectangles represent the target
 	positions.}
@@ -467,8 +470,11 @@
 behaviour.
 
 \begin{figure}
-	\caption{Learning is displayed for movement time by device and block
-	for the combo box and check box.}
+	\centering
+	\includegraphics{combobox-learning}
+	\includegraphics{checkbox-learning}
+	\caption{Learning is displayed for movement time by selection device
+	and test block for the combo box and check box.}
 	\label{fig-movement-time-learning}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -513,6 +519,7 @@
 target (the text box) had the fastest movement time.
 
 \begin{figure}
+	\centering
 	\includegraphics{movement-time}
 	\caption{Movement time for each target type across both devices and
 	all sizes.}
@@ -559,6 +566,7 @@
 Figure~\ref{fig-throughput}).
 
 \begin{figure}
+	\centering
 	\includegraphics{throughput}
 	\caption{Throughput for each target type across both devices and all
 	sizes.}
@@ -611,6 +619,7 @@
 these two targets have very good overall performance.
 
 \begin{figure}
+	\centering
 	\includegraphics{error-rate}
 	\caption{Error rate for each target type across both devices and all
 	sizes.}