- <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
- <html>
- <head>
- <title>UTas ePrints - Attention is Modulated by Motivational Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation of Affective Picture Processing</title>
- <script type="text/javascript" src="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/javascript/auto.js"><!-- padder --></script>
- <style type="text/css" media="screen">@import url(http://eprints.utas.edu.au/style/auto.css);</style>
- <style type="text/css" media="print">@import url(http://eprints.utas.edu.au/style/print.css);</style>
- <link rel="icon" href="/images/eprints/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" />
- <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/images/eprints/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" />
- <link rel="Top" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/" />
- <link rel="Search" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/search" />
- <meta content="Briggs, Kate Elizabeth" name="eprints.creators_name" />
- <meta content="thesis" name="eprints.type" />
- <meta content="2007-10-22 01:30:05" name="eprints.datestamp" />
- <meta content="2008-01-08 15:30:00" name="eprints.lastmod" />
- <meta content="show" name="eprints.metadata_visibility" />
- <meta content="Attention is Modulated by Motivational
- Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation
- of Affective Picture Processing" name="eprints.title" />
- <meta content="unpub" name="eprints.ispublished" />
- <meta content="380100" name="eprints.subjects" />
- <meta content="public" name="eprints.full_text_status" />
- <meta content="ERP evidence of affective picture processing generally agrees with one of two dominant
- theories. The first is that enhanced ERP responses to pleasant and unpleasant stimuli
- relative to neutral reflects the processing of stimulus motivational relevance, referred to
- as the quadratic effect, and the second is that enhanced ERP responses to unpleasant
- stimuli compared to pleasant and neutral stimuli reflects a negativity bias. The
- overarching aims of the current series of empirical studies were to identify which of the
- two aforementioned theories can most definitively account for affective picture
- processing (Phase 1); and to investigate how processes of attentional engagement and
- disengagement are influenced by the presence of motivationally relevant stimuli (Phase
- 2). Pictorial affective stimuli (high and low arousing pleasant, unpleasant, sexual, and
- neutral stimuli) were presented in a modified oddball paradigm to 38 participants (19
- male, 19 female) in Experiment 1 and 34 participants (17 male, 17 female) in Experiment
- 2. A negativity bias was demonstrated for P3b amplitude in Experiment 1; however
- significantly enhanced P3b amplitudes evoked in response to sexually explicit stimuli in
- Experiment 2 was not consistent with either dominant theory, and raised questions as to
- the separable effects of motivational relevance and sexual arousal on cognitive processes.
- Experiment 3 was aimed at investigating whether ERP responses are differentially
- modulated by the social content of affective picture stimuli. The same participants from
- Experiment 2 participated in Experiment 3 and the oddball task involved the presentation
- of low arousing social and non-social pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral stimuli. No
- significant differences in ERP component measures were shown between social and nonsocial
- pleasant, or between social and non-social unpleasant stimuli, however both P2 and
- P3b component amplitudes were enhanced in response to neutral faces compared with
- neutral objects. Factors associated with facial recognition and difficulties extracting
- affective information from a somewhat ambiguous neutral expression were cited as
- possible explanations for the observed ERP component modulations.
- The principal aim of Phase 2 was to investigate whether the presentation of
- appetitive and aversive cues influences the engagement and disengagement components
- of covert visual attention as inferred by responses to validly and invalidly cued targets
- respectively. Participants in Experiment 4 @=I9 female) and Experiment 5 @=I8
- female) were presented with a modified peripheral cueing paradigm, where pictorial
- stimuli (sexual, mutilation, threatening, and neutral) served as peripheral cues. Target
- processing as indexed by P1 and P3b amplitude showed significant facilitation in both
- Experiments 4 and 5 when targets were cued by sexual and mutilation stimuli, regardless
- of whether cueing was valid or invalid. It was therefore concluded that the engagement
- and disengagement components of covert visual attention are not differentially affected
- by motivationally relevant cues; rather, normal participants demonstrate a global
- response bias when respondmg to targets that are cued by motivationally relevant
- appetitive and aversive cues. The same participants from Experiment 5 were presented
- with a peripheral cueing paradigm in Experiment 6, which aimed to investigate the effect
- of phylogenetically (biological) and ontogenetically (cultural) fear-relevant stimuli on
- processes of covert visual attention. Pictorial stimuli depicting dangerous animals, human
- threat, and neutral objects served as peripheral cues. In line with preparedness theory
- (Seligman 1970, 1971), target processing was facilitated by the presence of animal threat
- stimuli compared to human threat and neutral stimuli, and also the early level of visual
- processing as indexed by cue-evoked P 1 amplitude was enhanced in response to
- phylogenetically, fear-relevant animal stimuli. A global response bias was again
- demonstrated in Experiment 6, and it was concluded that the attentional system of normal
- participants is sensitive to stimuli that have been evolutionarily associated with threat
- and/or fear. The current dissertation therefore has theoretical implications for the
- systematic study of affective picture processing. Furthermore, the introduction of a
- peripheral cueing paradigm to the study of affective picture processing provides a new
- insight into the effect that both appetitive and aversive stimuli have on processes of
- attentional orienting and target processing." name="eprints.abstract" />
- <meta content="2007-06" name="eprints.date" />
- <meta content="published" name="eprints.date_type" />
- <meta content="307" name="eprints.pages" />
- <meta content="University of Tasmania" name="eprints.institution" />
- <meta content="Psychology" name="eprints.department" />
- <meta content="phd" name="eprints.thesis_type" />
- <meta content="Adolphs, R. (2002). Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current Opinions in
- Neurobiology, 12, 169-177.
- Aftanas, L., Varlamov, A., Pavlov, S., Makhnev, V., & Reva, N. (2001). Event-related
- synchronization and desynchronization during affective processing: Emergence
- of valence-related time-dependent hemispheric asymmetries in theta and upper
- alpha band. International Journal of Neuroscience, 110, 197-219.
- Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Prezeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in
- social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention
- from threat? Behaviour and Research Therapy, 41, 1325-1335.
- Amrhein, C., Mühlberger, A., Pauli, P., & Wiedemann, G. (2004). Modulation of eventrelated
- brain potentials during affective picture processing: A complement to
- startle reflex and skin conductance response? International Journal of
- Psychophysiology, 54, 231-240.
- Birbaumer, N., Elbert, T., Canavan, A. G. M., & Rockstroh, B. (1990). Slow potentials
- of the cerebral cortex and behavior. Physiological Reviews, 79, 1-41.
- Bledowski, C., Prvulovic, D., Goebel, R., Zanella, F. E., & Linden, D. E. J. (2004).
- Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: A combined ERP and
- fMRI study. NeuroImage, 22, 530-540.
- Bousten, L., Humphreys, G. W., Praamstra, P., & Warbrick, T. (2006). Comparing
- neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of
- the Thatcher illusion. NeuroImage, 32, 352-367.
- Bradley, M. M. (2000). Emotion and motivation. In J. Cacioppo, T. L. G. Tassinary &
- G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 602-642).
- USA: Cambridge University Press.
- 241
- Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Sabatienlli, D., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and
- motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 3000-3319.
- Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B., N, & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and
- motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion,
- 1, 276-298.
- Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and
- physiology. In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion.
- New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bradley, M. M., Sabatienlli, D., Lang, P. J., Fitzsimmons, J., R, King, W., & Desai, P.
- (2003). Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention. Behavioural
- Neuroscience, 117, 369-380.
- Budo, G., Sarlo, M., & Palomba, D. (2002). Attentional resources measured by reaction
- times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli.
- Motivation and Emotion, 26, 123-137.
- Cacioppo, J., T, & Berntson, G., G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and
- evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive
- and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423.
- Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Bioelectrical
- echoes from evaluative categorizations: I a late positive brain potential that
- varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. Journal of Personality and
- Social Psychology, 67, 115-125.
- Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar
- conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space
- model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.
- 242
- Canli, T., Desmond, J. E., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Hemispheric asymmetry
- for emotional stimuli detected with fMRI. Neuroreport, 9, 3233-3239.
- Carretié, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Martín-Loeches, M., Mercardo, F., & Tapia, M. (2004).
- Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: Neural correlates. Human Brain
- Mapping, 22, 290-299.
- Carretié, L., Iglesias, T., Garcia, M., & Ballesteros, M. (1996). N300, P300 and the
- emotional processing of visual stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical
- Neurophysiology, 103, 298-303.
- Carretié, L., Iglesias, T., & Garcia, T. (1997). A study on the emotional processing of
- visual stimuli through event-related potentials. Brain and Cognition, 34, 207-
- 217.
- Carretié, L., Martín-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A., & Mercardo, F. (2001b). Emotion and
- attention interactions studies through event-related potentials. Journal of
- Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1109-1128.
- Carretié, L., Mercardo, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001a). Emotion, attention, and
- the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials. International
- Journal of Psychophysiology, 41, 75-85.
- Clark, V. P., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Spatial selective attention affects early
- extrastriate but not specific striate components of the visual evoked potential.
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 387-402.
- Collie, A., Maruff, P., Yucel, M., Currie, J., & Danckert, J. (2000). Spatiotemporal
- distribution of facilitation and inhibition of return arising from the reflexive
- orienting of covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
- Perception and Performance, 26, 1733-1745.
- 243
- Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual
- stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30.
- Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1989). Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant
- versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Abnormal
- Psychology, 98, 448-459.
- Cook, M., & Mineka, S. (1990). Selective associations in the observational conditioning
- of fear in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal
- Behavior Processes, 16, 372-389.
- Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task
- relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and
- Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
- Crites, S. L., Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1995). Bioelectrical
- echoes from evaluative categorization: II A late positive brain potential that
- varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. Journal of
- Personality and Social Psychology.
- Crowley, K. E., & Colrain, I. M. (2004). A review of the evidence for P2 being an
- independent component process: Age, sleep, and modality. Clinical
- Neurophysiology, 115, 732-744.
- Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000).
- Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic
- arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52, 95-111.
- Damasio, A. R. (1995). Toward a neurobiology of emotion and feeling: Operational
- concepts and hypotheses. The Neuroscientist, 1, 19-25.
- Davidson, R. J. (1992). Emotion and affective style: Hemispheric substrates.
- Psychological Science, 3, 39-43.
- 244
- Davidson, R. J. (1993a). Cerebral asymmetry and emotion: Conceptual and
- methodological conundrums. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 115-138.
- Davidson, R. J. (1993b). Parsing affective space: Perspectives from neuropsychology
- and psychophysiology. Neuropsychology, 7, 464-475.
- Davidson, R. J., Ekman, P., Saron, C. D., Senulis, J. A., & Friesen, W. (1990).
- Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain
- physiology I. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 330-341.
- de Jong, P. J., Merckelbach, H., & Arntz, A. (1995). Covariation bias in phobic women:
- The relationship between a priori expectancy, on-line expectancy, autonomic
- responding, and a posteriori contingency judgement. Journal of Abnormal
- Psychology, 104, 55-62.
- De Silva, P., Rachman, S. S., & Seligman, M. P. E. (1977). Prepared phobias and
- obsessions: Therapeutic outcome. Behaviour and Research Therapy, 15, 65-77.
- Decon, D., Breton, F., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G. (1991). The relationship between
- N2 and N400: Scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance.
- Psychophysiology, 28, 185-200.
- Delplanque, S., Lavoie, M. E., Hot, P., Silvert, L., & Sequeira, H. (2004). Modulation of
- cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related
- potentials in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 365, 1-4.
- Delplanque, S., Silvert, L., Hot, P., Rigoulot, S., & Sequeira, H. (2006). Arousal and
- valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization.
- International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 315-322.
- Delplanque, S., Silvert, L., Hot, P., & Sequeira, H. (2005). Event-related P3a and P3b in
- response to unpredictable emotional stimuli. Biological Psychology, 68, 107-120.
- 245
- Demaree, H. A., Everhart, D. E., Youngstrom, E. A., & Harrison, D. W. (2005). Brain
- lateralization of emotional processing: Historical roots and a future incorporating
- "dominance". Behavioural and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4, 3-20.
- Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1996). Regulatory processes and the development of
- cognitive representations. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 215-235.
- Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1992). Neural mechanisms of emotion. Journal of
- Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 329-338.
- Diedrich, O., Naumann, E., Maier, S., Becker, G., & Bartussek, D. (1997). A frontal
- slow wave in the ERP associated with emotional slides. Journal of
- Psychophysiology, 11, 71-84.
- Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the late positive complex:
- Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighbourhood of
- the P300. Psychophysiology, 41, 665-678.
- Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!...surprise? Psychophysiology, 18, 491-513.
- Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. G. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of
- context updating? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
- Dunn, B. R., Dunn, D. A., Languis, M., & Andrews, D. (1998). The relation of ERP
- components to complex memory processing. Brain and Cognition, 36, 355-376.
- Eimer, M. (1996). ERP modulations indicate the selective processing of visual stimuli as
- a result of transient and sustained spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 33, 13-21.
- Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved
- in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694-705.
- Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face
- processing. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 13, 1-5.
- 246
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Consulting Psychology
- Press, Plato Alto, CA.
- Empson, J. (1986). Human Brain Waves: The Psychological Significance of the
- Electroencephalogram. New York: Stockon Press.
- Esteves, F., Parra, C., Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1994). Nonconscious associative
- learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fearrelevant
- facial stimuli. Psychophysiology, 31, 375-385.
- Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Coles, M. G. H. (2000). Event-related brain potentials:
- methods, theory, and applications. In J. Cacioppo, T. L. G. Tassinary & G..
- Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed.) (pp. 53-84). USA:
- Cambridge University Press.
- Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowels, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or
- hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
- General, 130, 681-700.
- Friedmann, D., Cycowitz, M. Y., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related
- brain potential (ERP) sign on the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and
- Behavioural Reviews, 25, 355-373.
- Gaeta, H., Friedmann, D., & Hunt, G. (2003). Stimulus characteristics and task category
- dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology,
- 40, 198-208.
- Gainotti, G. (2000). Neuropsychological theories of emotion. In J. C. Borod (Ed.), The
- Neuropsychology of Emotion (pp. 214-235). Oxford, UK: Oxford University
- Press.
- 247
- García-Larrea, L., Lukaszewicz, A-C., & Mauguiere, F. (1992). Revisiting the oddball
- paradigm. Non-target vs neutral stimuli and the evaluation of ERP attentional
- effects. Neuropsychologia, 30, 723-741.
- Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Probability effects
- on stimulus evaluation and response processes. Journal of Experimental
- Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 198-216.
- George, M. S., Ketter, T. A., Parekh, P. I., Herscovitch, P., & Post, R. M. (1996).
- Gender differences in regional cerebral blood flow during transient self-induced
- sadness or happiness. Biological Psychiatry, 40, 859-871.
- Georgiou, G., A, Bleakley, C., Hayward, J., Russo, R., Dutton, K., Eltiti, S., et al.
- (2005). Focusing on fear: Attentional disengagement from emotional faces.
- Visual Cognition, 12, 145-158.
- Goldstein, A., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2002). The influence of stimulus
- deviance and novelty on the P300 and Novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 39, 781-
- 790.
- Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The new radix. In P. R.
- Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencore: Free
- Press.
- Hagemann, D., Hewig, J., Naumann, E., Seifert, J., & Bartussek, D. (2005). Resting
- brain asymmetry and affective reactivity: Aggregated data support the righthemisphere
- hypothesis. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 139-154.
- Hamm, A. O., Schupp, H., T., & Weike, A., I. (2003). Motivational organization of
- emotions: Autonomic changes, cortical responses, and reflex modulation. In R. J.
- Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective
- science (pp. 187-212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 248
- Heller, W. (1990). The neuropsychology of emotion: Developmental patterns and
- implications form psychopathology. In N. Stein, B. L. Leventhal & T. Trabasso
- (Eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 167-211).
- Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
- Heller, W. (1993). Neuropsychological mechanisms of individual differences in
- emotion, personality, and arousal. Neuropsychology, 7, 476-489.
- Henriques, J. B., & Davidson, R. J. (1990). Regional brain electrical asymmetries
- discriminate between previously depressed and healthy controls. Journal of
- Abnormal Psychology, 99, 22-31.
- Henriques, J. B., & Davidson, R. J. (1991). Left frontal hypo-activation in depression.
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 535-545.
- Hillman, C. H., Rosengren, K. S., & Smith, D. (2003). Emotion and motivated behavior:
- Postural adjustments to affective picture viewing. Biological Psychology, in
- press, 1-12.
- Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., & Mangun, G. R. (1994). The cuing of attention to visual
- field locations: Analysis with ERP recordings. In H. J. Heinze, T. F. Munte & G.
- R. Mangun (Eds.), Cognitive electrophysiology (pp. 1-25). Boston: Birhauser.
- Holmes, A., Vuilleumier, P., & Eimer, M. (2003). The processing of emotional facial
- expression is gated by spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain
- potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 174-184.
- Hopfinger, J., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of
- visual stimuli in the human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science, 9, 441-
- 447.
- 249
- Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2001). Tracking the influence of reflexive attention
- on sensory and cognitive processing. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral
- Neuroscience, 1, 56-65.
- Hopfinger, J., & Ries, A. (2005). Automatic versus contingent mechanisms of sensorydriven
- neural biasing and reflexive attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
- 17, 1341-1352.
- Hugdahl, K., & Johnsen, B. H. (1989). Preparedness and electrodermal fearconditioning:
- Ontogenetic vs phylogenetic explanations. Behaviour and
- Research Therapy, 27, 269-278.
- Hugdahl, K., & Karker, A.-C. (1981). Biological vs experimental factors in phobic
- conditioning. Behaviour and Research Therapy, 19, 109-115.
- Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2005). Variations on a human universal: Individual
- differences in positivity offset and negativity bias. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1-
- 26.
- Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the international
- affective picture system: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and
- Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855-879.
- Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more
- heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of
- Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.
- Jasper, H. H. (1958). The 10-20 electrode system of the international federation.
- Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375..
- Johnson Jr, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-
- 383.
- 250
- Johnson Jr, R. (1993). On the neural generators of the P300 component of the eventrelated
- potential. Psychophysiology, 30, 90-97.
- Johnston, V. S., Miller, D. R., & Burleson, M. H. (1986). Multiple P3s to emotional
- stimuli and their theoretical significance. Psychophysiology, 23, 684-693.
- Jones, N. A., & Fox, N. A. (1992). Electroencephalogram asymmetry during
- emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity.
- Brain and Cognition, 20, 280-299.
- Junghöfer, M., Bradley, M. M., Elbert, T., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Fleeting images: A new
- look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology, 38, 175-178.
- Karama, S., Lecours, A. R., Lerox, J-M., Bourgouin, P., Beaudoin, G., Jourbert, S., et al.
- (2002). Areas of brain activation in males and females during viewing of erotic
- film excerpts. Human Brain Mapping, 16-13.
- Katayma, J., & Polich, J. (1998). Stimulus context determines the P3a and P3b.
- Psychophysiology, 35, 23-33.
- Kayser, J., Tenke, C., Nordby, H., Hammerborg, D., Hugdahl, K., & Erdmann, G.
- (1997). Event-related potential (ERP) asymmetries to emotional stimuli in a
- visual half-field paradigm. Psychophysiology, 34, 414-426.
- Keil, A., Bradley, M. M., Hauk, O., Rockstroh, B., Elbert, T., & Lang, P. J. (2002).
- Large-scale correlates of affective picture processing. Psychophysiology, 39,
- 641-649.
- Kemp, A. H., Silberstein, R. B., Armstrong, S. M., & Nathan, P. J. (2004). Gender
- differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional
- stimuli. NeuroImage, 21, 632-646.
- Kenedy, S. J., Rapee, R. M., & Mazurski, J. (1997). Covariation bias for phylogenetic vs
- ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli. Behaviour and Research Therapy, 35, 415-422.
- 251
- Kenntner-Mabials, R., & Pauli, P. (2005). Affective modulation of brain potentials to
- painful and nonpainful stimuli. Psychophysiology, 42, 559-567.
- Kok, A. (1997). Event-related potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: A review
- and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45, 19-56.
- Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity.
- Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
- Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain: an interdisciplinary approach.
- Chicago: Chicago University Press
- Kopp, B., & Altmann, R. (2005). Neurocognitive effects of phobia-related stimuli in
- animal-fearful individuals. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioural Neuroscience,
- 5, 373-387.
- Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The
- P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
- Lane, R. D., Chua, P. M. L., & Dolan, R. .J. (1999). Common effects of emotional
- valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of
- pictures. Neuropsychologia, 37, 989-997.
- Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe. American Psychologist, 50, 372-385.
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B., N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the
- startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377-395.
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1992). A motivational analysis of
- emotion: Reflex-cortex connections. Psychological Science, 3, 44-49.
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect,
- activation, and action. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons & M. T. Balaban (Eds.),
- Attention and orienting: sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97-135).
- Manhwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates Publishers.
- 252
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). University of Florida Patent No.
- Technical Report A-4, The Centre for Research in Psychophysiology.
- Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., Fitzsimmons, J. R., Cuthbert, B. N., Scott, J. D., Moulder,
- B., et al. (1998). Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: An fMRI
- analysis. Psychophysiology, 32, 199-210.
- Lang, P. J., Davis, M., & Öhman, A. (2000). Fear and anxiety: Animal models and
- human cognitive psychophysiology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 137-159.
- Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at
- pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioural reactions. Psychophysiology,
- 30, 261-273.
- Lavric, A., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Forstmeier, S. (2004). When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally
- frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of
- Neuroscience, 20, 2483-2488.
- Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.
- American Psychologist, 37, 1019-1024.
- Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124-
- 129.
- LeDoux, J. E. (1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain. Cognition and
- Emotion, 3, 267-289.
- LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23,
- 155-184.
- Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. (1987). The relationship of emotion to cognition: A
- functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 3-28.
- Lewis, M. D., & Stieben, J. (2004). Emotion regulation in the brain: Conceptual issues
- and directions for developmental research. Child Development, 75, 371-376
- 253
- Livesey, P. J. (1986). Learning and emotion: A biological synthesis (Vol. 1). Hillsdale,
- N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Loew, A., Bradley, M. M., Keller, A. R., & Lang, P. J. (2003). Emotional arousal and
- novelty: Effects of within-session repetition on ERPs and skin conductance.
- Psychophysiology, S55.
- Mangun, G. R. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.
- Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18.
- Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Mechanisms and models of selective attention.
- In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind. Oxford,
- England: Oxford University Press.
- Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual
- space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI
- (pp. 189-204). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
- McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential
- study of inhibition of return. Perception and psychophysics, 61, 1411-1423.
- McManis, M. H., Bradley, M. M., Berg, W. K., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001).
- Emotional reactions in children: Verbal, physiological, and behavioural
- responses to affective pictures. Psychophysiology, 38, 222-231.
- Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events:
- An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 477-500.
- Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In J. M. Hunt (Ed.), Personality
- and the behavioural disorders: A handbook based on experimental clinical
- research. USA: The Ronald Press Company.
- 254
- Miller, N. E. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extensions to conflict
- behavior, motivation, and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study
- of a science. General systematic formulations, learning, and special processes.
- USA: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
- Mineka, S., & Öhman, A. (2002). Phobias and preparedness: The selective, automatic,
- and encapsulated nature of fear. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 927-937.
- Mini, A., Palomba, D., & Bravi, S. (1996). Emotional information processing and visual
- evoked brain potentials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 143-152.
- Mourão-Miranda, J., Volchan, E., Moll, J., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Oliveira, L., Bramati,
- I., et al. (2003). Contributions of stimulus valence and arousal to visual
- activation during emotional perception. NeuroImage, 20, 1955-1963.
- Mühlburger, A., Wiedemann, G., Hermann, M. J., & Pauli, P. (2006). Phylo- and
- ontogenetic fears and the expectancy of danger: Differences between spider- and
- flight-phobic subjects in cognitive and physiological responses to disorderspecific
- stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 380-589.
- Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual
- attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of
- Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
- Näätänen, R., Alho, K., & Schroger, E. (2002). Electrophysiology of attention. In H.
- Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology (pp.
- 601-653). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
- Nelson, C. A., & Nugent, K. M. (1990). Recognition memory and resource allocation as
- revealed by children's event-related potential responses to happy and angry faces.
- Developmental Psychology, 26, 171-179.
- 255
- Öhman, A. (1986). Face the beast and fear the face: Animal and social fears as
- prototypes for evolutionary analyses of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23, 123-145.
- Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the
- snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466-478.
- Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A
- threat advantage with schematic faces. Journal of Personality and Social
- Psychology, 80, 381-396.
- Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, Phobias, and Preparedness: Toward an evolved
- module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483-522.
- Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2003). The malicious serpent: Snakes as a prototypical
- stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Current Directions in Psychological
- Science, 12, 5-9.
- Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1993). On the automatic nature of phobic fearconditioned
- electrodermal responses to masked fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of
- Abnormal Psychology, 102, 121-132.
- Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1998). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli:
- Expectancies for aversive outcomes following nonrecognized fear-relevant
- stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 69-82.
- Palomba, D., Angrilli, A., & Mini, A. (1997). Visual evoked potentials, heart rate
- responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli. International Journal of
- Psychophysiology, 27, 55-67.
- Panksepp, J. (2003). At the interface of the affective, behavioural, and cognitive
- neurosciences: Decoding the emotional feelings of the brain. Brain and
- Cognition, 52, 4-14.
- 256
- Patterson, D. W., & Schmidt, L. A. (2003). Neuroanatomy of the human affective
- system. Brain and Cognition, 52, 24-26.
- Perchet, C., & García-Larrea, L. (2000). Visuospatial attention and motor reaction in
- children: An electrophysiological study of the "Posner" paradigm.
- Psychophysiology, 37, 231-241.
- Picton, T. W. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of
- Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479.
- Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson Jr, R., et al.
- (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition:
- Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
- Polich, J., & Camerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and
- topography. Brain Topography, 15, 141-152.
- Polich, J., & Kok, A. (1995). Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: An
- integrative review. Biological Psychology, 41, 103-146.
- Pollack, S. D., & Tolley-Schell, S. A. (2003). Selective attention to facial emotion in
- physically abused children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 323-383.
- Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
- Psychology, 32, 3-25.
- Posner, M. I. (1988). Structures and functions of selective attention. In T. Boll & B. K.
- Bryant (Eds.), Neurophysiology and brain function: The master lectures series
- (Vol. 7, pp. 173-202). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
- Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & T.
- U. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ:
- Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- 257
- Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual
- Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
- Posner, M. I., & Rafal, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control spatial orienting.
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 298, 187-
- 198.
- Pourtois, G., Dan, E. S., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2005). Enhanced
- extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful-faces:
- Time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping. Human Brain
- Mapping, 26, 65-79.
- Prime, D. J, & Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response.
- Psychological Science, 15, 272-276.
- Prime, D., J, & Ward, L., M. (2006). Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Brain
- Research, 1072, 161-174.
- Pritchard, W. S. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506-
- 540.
- Pritchard, W. S., Brandt, M., & Barratt, E. S. (1986). Analyzing event-related potentials:
- The utility of high and low pass filtering in improving the relationship between
- various amplitude measures and principal components analysis factor scores.
- Psychophysiology, 23, 166-173.
- Pury, C. L. S., & Mineka, S. (1997). Covariation bias for blood-injury stimuli and
- aversive outcomes. Behaviour and Research Therapy, 35, 35-47.
- Rösler, F., & Heil, M. (1991). Toward a functional categorization of slow waves: Taking
- into account past and future events. Psychophysiology, 28, 344-358.
- Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negative dominance, and
- contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296-320.
- 258
- Ruchkin, D., Johnson, J. R., Mahaffey, D., & Sutton, S. (1988). Toward a functional
- categorization of slow waves. Psychophysiology, 25, 339-353.
- Rudell, A. P., & Hua, J. (1995). Recognition potential latency and word image
- degradation. Brain and Language, 51, 229-241.
- Rushby, J., Barry, R. J., & Doherty, R. (2005). Separation of the components of the late
- positive complex in an ERP dishabituation paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology,
- 116, 2363-2380.
- Russell, J. A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personality and Social
- Psychology, 37, 345-356.
- Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social
- Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
- Schneider, F., Habel, U., Kessler, C., Salloum, J. B., & Posse, S. (2000). Gender
- differences in regional cerebral activity during sadness. Human Brain Mapping,
- 9, 226-238.
- Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T. A., & Lang, P. J.
- (2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by
- motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37, 257-261.
- Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Hillman, C. H., Hamm, A. O., & Lang,
- P. J. (2004). Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention.
- Cognition and Emotion, 18, 593-611.
- Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2003b). Attention and
- emotion: An ERP analysis of facilitated emotional stimulus processing.
- NeuroReport, 14, 1-5.
- 259
- Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I, & Hamm, A. O. (2003a). Emotional
- facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychological Science, 14,
- 7-13.
- Schupp, H. T., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I, & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The selective
- processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis.
- Psychophysiology, 41, 441-449.
- Schupp, H., T., Öhman, A., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A., I, Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A.
- O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP analysis.
- Emotion, 4, 189-200.
- Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (1997).
- Probe P3 and blinks: Two measures of affective startle modulation.
- Psychophysiology, 34, 1-6.
- Seifert, J., Naumann, E., Hewig, J., Hagemann, D., & Bartussek, D. (2006). Motivated
- executive attention-incentives and the noise compatibility effect. Biological
- Psychology, 71, 80-89.
- Seligman, M. P. E. (1970). On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological
- Review, 77, 406-418.
- Seligman, M. P. E. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307-320.
- Simon-Thomas, E. R., Role, K. O., & Knight, R. T. (2005). Behavioural and
- electrophysiological evidence of a right hemisphere bias for the influence of
- negative emotion on higher cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17,
- 518-529.
- Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of
- Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
- 260
- Smith, N. K., Cacioppo, J. T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). May I have your attention please:
- Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 41,
- 171-183.
- Speilberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the
- State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (form Y). Redwood City, California: Mind Garden.
- Stormark, H., Morten, K., Nordby, H., & Hugdahl, K. (1995). Attentional shifts to
- emotionally charged cues: Behavioural and ERP data. Cognition and Emotion, 9,
- 507-523.
- Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked potential correlates of
- stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
- Taylor, M. J. (2002). Non-spatial attentional effects on P1. Clinical Neurophysiology,
- 113, 1903-1908.
- Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., & Neill, W. T. (1994). Does "inhibition of return" occur in
- discrimination tasks? Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 279-286.
- Tipples, J., & Sharma, D. (2000). Orienting to exogenous cues and attentional pictures
- reflect separate processes. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 87-97.
- Tomarken, A. J., & Mineka, S. (1989). Fear-relevant selective associations and
- covariation bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 381-394.
- Tomarken, A. J., Sutton, S. K., & Mineka, S. (1995). Fear-relevant illusory correlations:
- What types of associations promote judgemental bias. Journal of Abnormal
- Psychology, 104, 312-326.
- van de Laar, M. C., Licht, R., Franken, I. H. A., & Hendriks, V. M. (2004). Eventrelated
- potentials indicate motivational relevance of cocaine cues in abstinent
- cocaine addicts. Psychopharmacology, 177, 121-129.
- 261
- Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context
- updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioural and
- Brain Sciences, 11, 343-427.
- Wascher, E., & Tipper, S. (2004). Revealing effects of noninformative spatial cues: An
- EEG study of inhibition of return. Psychophysiology, 41, 716-728.
- Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Towards a consensual structure of mood.
- Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
- Wolpe, J., & Lang, P. J. (1964). A fear survey schedule for use in behaviour therapy.
- Behaviour and Research Therapy, 2, 27-30.
- Wrase, J., Klein, S., Gruesser, S. M., Hermann, D., Flor, H., Mann, K., et al. (2003).
- Gender differences in the processing of standardized emotional visual stimuli in
- humans: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters,
- 348, 41-45.
- Yiend, J., & Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. The
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 665-681.
- Zafiropoulou, M., & McPherson, F. M. M. (1986). 'Preparedness" and the severity and
- outcomes of clinical phobias. Behaviour and Research Therapy, 24, 221-222.
- Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American
- Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
- Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117-123." name="eprints.referencetext" />
- <meta content="Briggs, Kate Elizabeth (2007) Attention is Modulated by Motivational Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation of Affective Picture Processing. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania." name="eprints.citation" />
- <meta content="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/1/01front_Kbriggs.pdf" name="eprints.document_url" />
- <meta content="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/2/02whole_kbriggs.pdf" name="eprints.document_url" />
- <link rel="schema.DC" href="http://purl.org/DC/elements/1.0/" />
- <meta content="Attention is Modulated by Motivational
- Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation
- of Affective Picture Processing" name="DC.title" />
- <meta content="Briggs, Kate Elizabeth" name="DC.creator" />
- <meta content="380100 Psychology" name="DC.subject" />
- <meta content="ERP evidence of affective picture processing generally agrees with one of two dominant
- theories. The first is that enhanced ERP responses to pleasant and unpleasant stimuli
- relative to neutral reflects the processing of stimulus motivational relevance, referred to
- as the quadratic effect, and the second is that enhanced ERP responses to unpleasant
- stimuli compared to pleasant and neutral stimuli reflects a negativity bias. The
- overarching aims of the current series of empirical studies were to identify which of the
- two aforementioned theories can most definitively account for affective picture
- processing (Phase 1); and to investigate how processes of attentional engagement and
- disengagement are influenced by the presence of motivationally relevant stimuli (Phase
- 2). Pictorial affective stimuli (high and low arousing pleasant, unpleasant, sexual, and
- neutral stimuli) were presented in a modified oddball paradigm to 38 participants (19
- male, 19 female) in Experiment 1 and 34 participants (17 male, 17 female) in Experiment
- 2. A negativity bias was demonstrated for P3b amplitude in Experiment 1; however
- significantly enhanced P3b amplitudes evoked in response to sexually explicit stimuli in
- Experiment 2 was not consistent with either dominant theory, and raised questions as to
- the separable effects of motivational relevance and sexual arousal on cognitive processes.
- Experiment 3 was aimed at investigating whether ERP responses are differentially
- modulated by the social content of affective picture stimuli. The same participants from
- Experiment 2 participated in Experiment 3 and the oddball task involved the presentation
- of low arousing social and non-social pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral stimuli. No
- significant differences in ERP component measures were shown between social and nonsocial
- pleasant, or between social and non-social unpleasant stimuli, however both P2 and
- P3b component amplitudes were enhanced in response to neutral faces compared with
- neutral objects. Factors associated with facial recognition and difficulties extracting
- affective information from a somewhat ambiguous neutral expression were cited as
- possible explanations for the observed ERP component modulations.
- The principal aim of Phase 2 was to investigate whether the presentation of
- appetitive and aversive cues influences the engagement and disengagement components
- of covert visual attention as inferred by responses to validly and invalidly cued targets
- respectively. Participants in Experiment 4 @=I9 female) and Experiment 5 @=I8
- female) were presented with a modified peripheral cueing paradigm, where pictorial
- stimuli (sexual, mutilation, threatening, and neutral) served as peripheral cues. Target
- processing as indexed by P1 and P3b amplitude showed significant facilitation in both
- Experiments 4 and 5 when targets were cued by sexual and mutilation stimuli, regardless
- of whether cueing was valid or invalid. It was therefore concluded that the engagement
- and disengagement components of covert visual attention are not differentially affected
- by motivationally relevant cues; rather, normal participants demonstrate a global
- response bias when respondmg to targets that are cued by motivationally relevant
- appetitive and aversive cues. The same participants from Experiment 5 were presented
- with a peripheral cueing paradigm in Experiment 6, which aimed to investigate the effect
- of phylogenetically (biological) and ontogenetically (cultural) fear-relevant stimuli on
- processes of covert visual attention. Pictorial stimuli depicting dangerous animals, human
- threat, and neutral objects served as peripheral cues. In line with preparedness theory
- (Seligman 1970, 1971), target processing was facilitated by the presence of animal threat
- stimuli compared to human threat and neutral stimuli, and also the early level of visual
- processing as indexed by cue-evoked P 1 amplitude was enhanced in response to
- phylogenetically, fear-relevant animal stimuli. A global response bias was again
- demonstrated in Experiment 6, and it was concluded that the attentional system of normal
- participants is sensitive to stimuli that have been evolutionarily associated with threat
- and/or fear. The current dissertation therefore has theoretical implications for the
- systematic study of affective picture processing. Furthermore, the introduction of a
- peripheral cueing paradigm to the study of affective picture processing provides a new
- insight into the effect that both appetitive and aversive stimuli have on processes of
- attentional orienting and target processing." name="DC.description" />
- <meta content="2007-06" name="DC.date" />
- <meta content="Thesis" name="DC.type" />
- <meta content="NonPeerReviewed" name="DC.type" />
- <meta content="application/pdf" name="DC.format" />
- <meta content="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/1/01front_Kbriggs.pdf" name="DC.identifier" />
- <meta content="application/pdf" name="DC.format" />
- <meta content="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/2/02whole_kbriggs.pdf" name="DC.identifier" />
- <meta content="Briggs, Kate Elizabeth (2007) Attention is Modulated by Motivational Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation of Affective Picture Processing. PhD thesis, University of Tasmania." name="DC.identifier" />
- <meta content="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/" name="DC.relation" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/BibTeX/epprod-eprint-2277.bib" title="BibTeX" type="text/plain" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/ContextObject/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="OpenURL ContextObject" type="text/xml" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/ContextObject::Dissertation/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="OpenURL Dissertation" type="text/xml" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/ContextObject::Journal/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="OpenURL Journal" type="text/xml" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/DC/epprod-eprint-2277.txt" title="Dublin Core" type="text/plain" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/DIDL/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="DIDL" type="text/xml" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/EndNote/epprod-eprint-2277.enw" title="EndNote" type="text/plain" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/HTML/epprod-eprint-2277.html" title="HTML Citation" type="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/METS/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="METS" type="text/xml" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/MODS/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="MODS" type="text/xml" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/RIS/epprod-eprint-2277.ris" title="Reference Manager" type="text/plain" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/Refer/epprod-eprint-2277.refer" title="Refer" type="text/plain" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/Simple/epprod-eprint-2277text" title="Simple Metadata" type="text/plain" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/Text/epprod-eprint-2277.txt" title="ASCII Citation" type="text/plain; charset=utf-8" />
- <link rel="alternate" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/export/2277/XML/epprod-eprint-2277.xml" title="EP3 XML" type="text/xml" />
-
- </head>
- <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" onLoad="loadRoutine(); MM_preloadImages('images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c5_f2.gif','images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c7_f2.gif','images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c8_f2.gif','images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c9_f2.gif','images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c10_f2.gif','images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c11_f2.gif','images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r6_c4_f2.gif')">
-
- <div class="ep_noprint"><noscript><style type="text/css">@import url(http://eprints.utas.edu.au/style/nojs.css);</style></noscript></div>
-
-
-
-
- <table width="795" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
- <tr>
- <td><script language="JavaScript1.2">mmLoadMenus();</script>
- <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="795">
- <!-- fwtable fwsrc="eprints_banner_final2.png" fwbase="ePrints_banner.gif" fwstyle="Dreamweaver" fwdocid = "1249563342" fwnested="0" -->
- <tr>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="32" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="104" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="44" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="105" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="41" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="16" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="68" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="68" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="68" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="82" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="69" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="98" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="12"><img name="ePrints_banner_r1_c1" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r1_c1.gif" width="795" height="10" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="10" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td rowspan="6"><img name="ePrints_banner_r2_c1" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r2_c1.gif" width="32" height="118" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td rowspan="5"><a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/"><img name="ePrints_banner_r2_c2" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r2_c2.gif" width="104" height="103" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
- <td colspan="10"><img name="ePrints_banner_r2_c3" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r2_c3.gif" width="659" height="41" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="41" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3"><a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/"><img name="ePrints_banner_r3_c3" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r3_c3.gif" width="190" height="31" border="0" alt="" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="2" colspan="7"><img name="ePrints_banner_r3_c6" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r3_c6.gif" width="469" height="37" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="31" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="3"><img name="ePrints_banner_r4_c3" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r4_c3.gif" width="190" height="6" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="6" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td colspan="2"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c3" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c3.gif" width="149" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td rowspan="2" colspan="2"><a href="/information.html" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore();MM_startTimeout()" onMouseOver="MM_showMenu(window.mm_menu_0821132634_0,0,25,null,'ePrints_banner_r5_c5');MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r5_c5','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c5_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c5" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c5.gif" width="57" height="25" border="0" alt="About" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="2"><a href="/view/" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore();MM_startTimeout()" onMouseOver="MM_showMenu(window.mm_menu_0821133021_1,0,25,null,'ePrints_banner_r5_c7');MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r5_c7','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c7_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c7" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c7.gif" width="68" height="25" border="0" alt="Browse" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="2"><a href="/perl/search/simple" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore();MM_startTimeout()" onMouseOver="MM_showMenu(window.mm_menu_0821133201_2,0,25,null,'ePrints_banner_r5_c8');MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r5_c8','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c8_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c8" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c8.gif" width="68" height="25" border="0" alt="Search" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="2"><a href="/perl/register" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore();MM_startTimeout();" onMouseOver="MM_showMenu(window.mm_menu_1018171924_3,0,25,null,'ePrints_banner_r5_c9');MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r5_c9','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c9_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c9" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c9.gif" width="68" height="25" border="0" alt="register" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="2"><a href="/perl/users/home" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore();MM_startTimeout()" onMouseOver="MM_showMenu(window.mm_menu_0821133422_4,0,25,null,'ePrints_banner_r5_c10');MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r5_c10','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c10_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c10" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c10.gif" width="82" height="25" border="0" alt="user area" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="2"><a href="/help/" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore();MM_startTimeout()" onMouseOver="MM_showMenu(window.mm_menu_0821133514_5,0,25,null,'ePrints_banner_r5_c11');MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r5_c11','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c11_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c11" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c11.gif" width="69" height="25" border="0" alt="Help" /></a></td>
- <td rowspan="3" colspan="4"><img name="ePrints_banner_r5_c12" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r5_c12.gif" width="98" height="40" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td rowspan="2"><img name="ePrints_banner_r6_c3" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r6_c3.gif" width="44" height="39" border="0" alt="ePrints home" /></td>
- <td><a href="/" onMouseOut="MM_swapImgRestore()" onMouseOver="MM_swapImage('ePrints_banner_r6_c4','','/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r6_c4_f2.gif',1);"><img name="ePrints_banner_r6_c4" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r6_c4.gif" width="105" height="24" border="0" alt="ePrints home" /></a></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="24" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td><img name="ePrints_banner_r7_c2" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r7_c2.gif" width="104" height="15" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td colspan="8"><img name="ePrints_banner_r7_c4" src="/images/eprints/ePrints_banner_r7_c4.gif" width="517" height="15" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- <td><img src="/images/eprints/spacer.gif" width="1" height="15" border="0" alt="" /></td>
- </tr>
- </table></td>
- </tr>
- <tr><td><table width="100%" style="font-size: 90%; border: solid 1px #ccc; padding: 3px"><tr>
- <td align="left"><a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/users/home">Login</a> | <a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/register">Create Account</a></td>
- <td align="right" style="white-space: nowrap">
- <form method="get" accept-charset="utf-8" action="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/search" style="display:inline">
- <input class="ep_tm_searchbarbox" size="20" type="text" name="q" />
- <input class="ep_tm_searchbarbutton" value="Search" type="submit" name="_action_search" />
- <input type="hidden" name="_order" value="bytitle" />
- <input type="hidden" name="basic_srchtype" value="ALL" />
- <input type="hidden" name="_satisfyall" value="ALL" />
- </form>
- </td>
- </tr></table></td></tr>
- <tr>
- <td class="toplinks"><!-- InstanceBeginEditable name="content" -->
-
-
- <div align="center">
-
- <table width="720" class="ep_tm_main"><tr><td align="left">
- <h1 class="ep_tm_pagetitle">Attention is Modulated by Motivational Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation of Affective Picture Processing</h1>
- <p style="margin-bottom: 1em" class="not_ep_block"><span class="person_name">Briggs, Kate Elizabeth</span> (2007) <xhtml:em>Attention is Modulated by Motivational Relevance: A Behavioural and ERP Investigation of Affective Picture Processing.</xhtml:em> PhD thesis, University of Tasmania.</p><p style="margin-bottom: 1em" class="not_ep_block"></p><table style="margin-bottom: 1em" class="not_ep_block"><tr><td valign="top" style="text-align:center"><a onmouseover="EPJS_ShowPreview( event, 'doc_preview_2877' );" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/1/01front_Kbriggs.pdf" onmouseout="EPJS_HidePreview( event, 'doc_preview_2877' );"><img alt="[img]" src="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png" class="ep_doc_icon" border="0" /></a><div class="ep_preview" id="doc_preview_2877"><table><tr><td><img alt="" src="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/thumbnails/1/preview.png" class="ep_preview_image" border="0" /><div class="ep_preview_title">Preview</div></td></tr></table></div></td><td valign="top"><a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/1/01front_Kbriggs.pdf"><span class="ep_document_citation">PDF (Front Matter)</span></a> - Requires a PDF viewer<br />372Kb</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" style="text-align:center"><a onmouseover="EPJS_ShowPreview( event, 'doc_preview_2878' );" href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/2/02whole_kbriggs.pdf" onmouseout="EPJS_HidePreview( event, 'doc_preview_2878' );"><img alt="[img]" src="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png" class="ep_doc_icon" border="0" /></a><div class="ep_preview" id="doc_preview_2878"><table><tr><td><img alt="" src="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/thumbnails/2/preview.png" class="ep_preview_image" border="0" /><div class="ep_preview_title">Preview</div></td></tr></table></div></td><td valign="top"><a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/2277/2/02whole_kbriggs.pdf"><span class="ep_document_citation">PDF (Whole Thesis)</span></a> - Requires a PDF viewer<br />4037Kb</td></tr></table><div class="not_ep_block"><h2>Abstract</h2><p style="padding-bottom: 16px; text-align: left; margin: 1em auto 0em auto">ERP evidence of affective picture processing generally agrees with one of two dominant
- theories. The first is that enhanced ERP responses to pleasant and unpleasant stimuli
- relative to neutral reflects the processing of stimulus motivational relevance, referred to
- as the quadratic effect, and the second is that enhanced ERP responses to unpleasant
- stimuli compared to pleasant and neutral stimuli reflects a negativity bias. The
- overarching aims of the current series of empirical studies were to identify which of the
- two aforementioned theories can most definitively account for affective picture
- processing (Phase 1); and to investigate how processes of attentional engagement and
- disengagement are influenced by the presence of motivationally relevant stimuli (Phase
- 2). Pictorial affective stimuli (high and low arousing pleasant, unpleasant, sexual, and
- neutral stimuli) were presented in a modified oddball paradigm to 38 participants (19
- male, 19 female) in Experiment 1 and 34 participants (17 male, 17 female) in Experiment
- 2. A negativity bias was demonstrated for P3b amplitude in Experiment 1; however
- significantly enhanced P3b amplitudes evoked in response to sexually explicit stimuli in
- Experiment 2 was not consistent with either dominant theory, and raised questions as to
- the separable effects of motivational relevance and sexual arousal on cognitive processes.
- Experiment 3 was aimed at investigating whether ERP responses are differentially
- modulated by the social content of affective picture stimuli. The same participants from
- Experiment 2 participated in Experiment 3 and the oddball task involved the presentation
- of low arousing social and non-social pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral stimuli. No
- significant differences in ERP component measures were shown between social and nonsocial
- pleasant, or between social and non-social unpleasant stimuli, however both P2 and
- P3b component amplitudes were enhanced in response to neutral faces compared with
- neutral objects. Factors associated with facial recognition and difficulties extracting
- affective information from a somewhat ambiguous neutral expression were cited as
- possible explanations for the observed ERP component modulations.
- The principal aim of Phase 2 was to investigate whether the presentation of
- appetitive and aversive cues influences the engagement and disengagement components
- of covert visual attention as inferred by responses to validly and invalidly cued targets
- respectively. Participants in Experiment 4 @=I9 female) and Experiment 5 @=I8
- female) were presented with a modified peripheral cueing paradigm, where pictorial
- stimuli (sexual, mutilation, threatening, and neutral) served as peripheral cues. Target
- processing as indexed by P1 and P3b amplitude showed significant facilitation in both
- Experiments 4 and 5 when targets were cued by sexual and mutilation stimuli, regardless
- of whether cueing was valid or invalid. It was therefore concluded that the engagement
- and disengagement components of covert visual attention are not differentially affected
- by motivationally relevant cues; rather, normal participants demonstrate a global
- response bias when respondmg to targets that are cued by motivationally relevant
- appetitive and aversive cues. The same participants from Experiment 5 were presented
- with a peripheral cueing paradigm in Experiment 6, which aimed to investigate the effect
- of phylogenetically (biological) and ontogenetically (cultural) fear-relevant stimuli on
- processes of covert visual attention. Pictorial stimuli depicting dangerous animals, human
- threat, and neutral objects served as peripheral cues. In line with preparedness theory
- (Seligman 1970, 1971), target processing was facilitated by the presence of animal threat
- stimuli compared to human threat and neutral stimuli, and also the early level of visual
- processing as indexed by cue-evoked P 1 amplitude was enhanced in response to
- phylogenetically, fear-relevant animal stimuli. A global response bias was again
- demonstrated in Experiment 6, and it was concluded that the attentional system of normal
- participants is sensitive to stimuli that have been evolutionarily associated with threat
- and/or fear. The current dissertation therefore has theoretical implications for the
- systematic study of affective picture processing. Furthermore, the introduction of a
- peripheral cueing paradigm to the study of affective picture processing provides a new
- insight into the effect that both appetitive and aversive stimuli have on processes of
- attentional orienting and target processing.</p></div><table style="margin-bottom: 1em" cellpadding="3" class="not_ep_block" border="0"><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">Item Type:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row">Thesis (PhD)</td></tr><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">Subjects:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row"><a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/view/subjects/380100.html">380000 Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences > 380100 Psychology</a></td></tr><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">ID Code:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row">2277</td></tr><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">Deposited By:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row"><span class="ep_name_citation"><span class="person_name">MS Heather Excell</span></span></td></tr><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">Deposited On:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row">22 Oct 2007 12:30</td></tr><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">Last Modified:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row">09 Jan 2008 02:30</td></tr><tr><th valign="top" class="ep_row">ePrint Statistics:</th><td valign="top" class="ep_row"><a target="ePrintStats" href="/es/index.php?action=show_detail_eprint;id=2277;">View statistics for this ePrint</a></td></tr></table><p align="right">Repository Staff Only: <a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/cgi/users/home?screen=EPrint::View&eprintid=2277">item control page</a></p>
- </td></tr></table>
- </div>
-
-
-
- <!-- InstanceEndEditable --></td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td><!-- #BeginLibraryItem "/Library/footer_eprints.lbi" -->
- <table width="795" border="0" align="left" cellpadding="0" class="footer">
- <tr valign="top">
- <td colspan="2"><div align="center"><a href="http://www.utas.edu.au">UTAS home</a> | <a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/library/">Library home</a> | <a href="/">ePrints home</a> | <a href="/contact.html">contact</a> | <a href="/information.html">about</a> | <a href="/view/">browse</a> | <a href="/perl/search/simple">search</a> | <a href="/perl/register">register</a> | <a href="/perl/users/home">user area</a> | <a href="/help/">help</a></div><br /></td>
- </tr>
- <tr><td colspan="2"><p><img src="/images/eprints/footerline.gif" width="100%" height="4" /></p></td></tr>
- <tr valign="top">
- <td width="68%" class="footer">Authorised by the University Librarian<br />
- © University of Tasmania ABN 30 764 374 782<br />
- <a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/cricos/">CRICOS Provider Code 00586B</a> | <a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/copyright/copyright_disclaimers.html">Copyright & Disclaimers</a> | <a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/accessibility/index.html">Accessibility</a> | <a href="http://eprints.utas.edu.au/feedback/">Site Feedback</a> </td>
- <td width="32%"><div align="right">
- <p align="right" class="NoPrint"><a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/"><img src="http://www.utas.edu.au/shared/logos/unioftasstrip.gif" alt="University of Tasmania Home Page" width="260" height="16" border="0" align="right" /></a></p>
- <p align="right" class="NoPrint"><a href="http://www.utas.edu.au/"><br />
- </a></p>
- </div></td>
- </tr>
- <tr valign="top">
- <td><p> </p></td>
- <td><div align="right"><span class="NoPrint"><a href="http://www.eprints.org/software/"><img src="/images/eprintslogo.gif" alt="ePrints logo" width="77" height="29" border="0" align="bottom" /></a></span></div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- <!-- #EndLibraryItem -->
- <div align="center"></div></td>
- </tr>
- </table>
-
- </body>
- </html>